![]() |
|
|
Financing Insurance Workplace Legal issues Name choice Name change Driver’s license Birth certificate Passport Marriage Will Other documents
|
John Money vs. J. Michael
Bailey
Takes one to know one, they say. John Money was an ethically-challenged sexologist at Johns Hopkins whose work led to the woes of untold intersex people around the world until his "science" was debunked and his academic misconduct exposed. Mike Bailey is an ethically-challenged sexologist at Northwestern whose work nearly led to the woes of untold transgender people around the world until his "science" was debunked and his academic misconduct exposed. John Money put out a book in May 1990 with the title: Mike Bailey's publicist did an article in March 2003 titled: The similarities in titles certainly beg a comparison, as do the remarkable similarities in the lives of the two well-known sexologists. Why would Bailey and friends replace "in-between" with "lying"? Below is a very interesting passage from pages 108-110 of John Moneys Gay, Straight, and In-Between: The Sexology of Exotic Orientation, with especially interesting comments in blue. "Gender Crosscoding" by John Money Among adolescents who circumvent homosexual activity or who quit in panic,
there are some who coerce themselves into heterosexuality, only to find as husbands
and fathers (or wives and mothers, in the case of females) that the lid on Pandoras
box springs open. These are the people who, when young adulthood advances into
midlife, begin the homosexual stage of sequential bisexuality. For some the
transition is to homosexual relations exclusively, whereas for others heterosexual
relations also may continue. The transition may take place autonomously, or
it may be a sequel to the divorce or death of the spouse or to sexual apathy
in the marriage. When the youngest child leaves home, there may be a degree
of freedom hitherto unavailable. The bisexualism of a parent is not transmitted
to the offspring, and is not contagious. However, to avoid offending a heterosexual
child, a bisexual parent may be self-coerced into suppressing homosexual expression. The late expression of homosexuality in sequential bisexuality may be associated
with recovery from illness and debilitation (e.g., recovery from alcoholism)
that had masked the homosexual potential. Hypothetically, it might, conversely,
be associated with premature illness and deterioration from brain injury or
disease, as in temporal lobe trauma and Alzheimers disease. However, although
brain pathology may release the expression of sexuality formerly strictly self-prohibited
as indecent or immoral, it is not especially associated with releasing bisexuality. In sequential bisexuality, the transition from homosexual to heterosexual expression
is also known to occur autonomously in adulthood. Since this transition is socially
approved and not registered as pathological, it is not likely to be recorded.
If the individual were at the time in some type of treatment, the transition
might be wrongly construed as a therapeutic triumph. More than sequential bisexuality, concurrent bisexuality
may be jocularly considered as having the best of two possible worlds. But it
has a dark and sinister potential also. Its most malignant expression is in
those individuals in whom it takes the form of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The
split applies not simply to heterosexuality and homosexuality, but to good and
evil, licit and illicit, as well. The two names are not gender-coded
as male and female as they are in the two names of the tranvsvestophile, nor
are the two personalities and the two wardrobes. Instead, the two names, wardrobes,
and personalities are both male (or in the less likely case of women, female),
but one, the given name with its wardrobe and personality, is for the heterosexual,
and the other, an alias or a nickname, for the homosexual. The heterosexual
personality is the servant of righteousness and the acolyte of a vengeful God.
The homosexual personality is the servant of transgression and a fallen angel
in the legions of Lucifer. The heterosexual personality
has the pontificating mission of a sadistic grand inquisitor, bent on the exorcism
of those possessed of homosexuality, himself included. The homosexual personality
has the absolving mission of officiating indulgences in the place of masochistic
penances for homosexuality, but only for himself and nobody else. The absolute antithesis of homophobia and homophilia
in this malignant form of bisexuality takes its toll in self-sabotage and the
sabotage of others. Self-sabotage is an ever-present threat that materializes
if there is a leakage of information from those in one antithetical world to
those in the other. The greater danger is, of course, that knowledge
of the illicit homosexual existence will leak out to the society that knows
only of the heterosexual existence. The ensuing societal abuse and deprivation,
legal and social, may be extreme. The sabotage of others is carried out professionally
by some individuals with the syndrome of malignant bisexualism. Their internal
homophobic war against their own homosexuality becomes externalized into a war
against homosexuality in others. The malignant bisexual becomes a secret agent,
living in his own private and secret homosexual world, while spying on its inhabitants,
entrapping them, assaulting and killing them, or, with less overt violence,
preaching against them, legislating against them, or judicially depriving them
of the right to exist. The malignant bisexual is the perfect recruit for the position of homosexual
entrapment officer or decoy in the employ of the police vice squad. Supported
by clandestine operations, blackmail, and threats of exposure, in espionage
or in the secret police of government surveillance, he may achieve legendary
power, such as that attributed to J. Edgar Hoover of mythical FBI fame. People in high places may have the power to keep under cover for a lifetime,
with the homosexual manifestations of their bisexuality never exposed. Others
have their career blown, as did the bisexual former U.S. congressman from Maryland,
Robert E. Bauman, a fanatical homophobic ultraconservative of the religious
new right, who subsequently published a biography of his own downfall (Bauman
1986). Bauman was exposed by a combination of surveillance and the testimony of a paid informant and blackmailer. Nowadays there is a hitherto nonexistent way of being suspected or exposed, namely by dying of AIDS. This is what happened to Roy Cohn (New York Times, August 3, 1986), the malignantly bisexual legal counsel for the homosexual witch hunter from Wisconsin, U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, himself suspected of malignant bisexuality. Together, they destroyed the lives of many American citizens, simply by publicly accusing them of being homosexual, falsely or otherwise.
Scratch the surface of the self-righteous and find the
devil. This is a maxim of widespread acceptability, not only to the self-righteous
in high places of homophobic power, influence, and authority, but also to the
homophobic, gay-bashing hoodlums who, as in the case with which this section
began, pick up or are picked up by a gay man, have sex with him, and then exorcise
their own homosexual guilt by assaulting and maybe killing him. Both
versions of homophobia are manifestations of malignant bisexuality that, in
an interview with the journalist, Doug Ireland, for New York Magazine (July
24, 1978), I called the exorcist syndrome. There must be a very widespread prevalence of lesser degrees of the exorcist syndrome in the population at large. If it were not so, otherwise-decent people would not persecute their homosexual fellow citizens nor tolerate their persecution. Instead they would live and let live those who are destined to have a different way of being human in love and sex. They would tolerate them as they do the left-handed. Tolerance would remove those very pressures that progressively coerce increasing numbers of our children and grandchildren to grow up blighted with the curse of malignant bisexuality. Reference: 1. Robin Pinnel at Joseph Henry Press March 21, 2003 Acknowledgement: Thanks to one of my many research assistants who sent along this information! |
|
|
|
||